DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 5S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 190i
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
JSR
Docket No. NR2815-14
24 July 2074
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: j _ ssf
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ret: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: DD Form 149 dtd 9 Apr 13 w/attachments
(1}
(2) HOMC MMSB/PERB memo dtd 24 Feb 14
(3) HOMC MIQ memo dtd 8 May 14
(4) Subject's naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval
recora be corrected by removing the fitness report for 25
February to 4 July 2011 (copy at Tab A} and the service record
page 11b (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 26 May
2011 {copy at Tab B).
>. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Hicks and Swarens,
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24
July 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered
by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
appiicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
‘administrative remedies available unger existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the
Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) Performance Evaluation Review
Board commented to the effect that the contested fitness report
should stand.
c. In correspondence attached as enclosure {3), the HOMC
office with cognizance over page 11 entries has commented to the
effect that Petitioner’s request warrants partial relief,
specifically, modification of the contested entry by changing
“Commanding General's Inspection” to “Permanent Change of
Station (PCS) Turnover Inspection.”
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,
and especially in light of the contents of enclosures (2) and
(3), the Board finds the existence of an error warranting the
following limited corrective action:
RECOMMENDATION :
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by
modification of the service record page ilb (“Administrative
Remarks (1070)") entry dated 26 May 2011 by changing “Commanding
General’s Inspection” to “Permanent Change of Station (PCS)
Turnover Inspection.”
b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or materiai be added to the record in the future.
c. That any material directed to be removed from .
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.
a. That the remainder of Petitioner’s request be denied.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c}) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6{c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of. the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
PInntyr- 4, bein
ROBERT D. 4ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
Rett Pot
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10692-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference ta), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)"”) entry dated 14 January 2009 (sic), a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bourgeois, J. Hicks and Ivins, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 February 2011, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04770-09
The Board, consisting of Ms. Wilcher and Messrs. Bowen and McBride, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 July 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below shouid be taken on the available evidence of record. Region 2, MCESC [sic] [Marine Corps Embassy Security Group], Counseled this date for the following deficiencies: Violations of Article 133 and Article 134 UCMI [Uniform Code of Military Justice] relating to an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06664-11
The Board, consisting of Ms. Aldrich and Messrs. Pfeiffer and Spain, reviewed Pétitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 September 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 26 October 2010. That any material or entries inconsistent with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0593 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 to 29% April 2011 (copy at Tab A), removing the service record page 1i (*Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 1 December 2010 and 10 May 2011 (copies at Tab 3) and changing his reenlistment code from RE-3C (Commandant of the Marine Corps...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9043 13
d. In correspondence attached as enclosure (4), MIO, the HOMC office with cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner's case, has commented to the effect that the request warrants partial relief, specifically, modification of the contested entry to remove “,which resulted in you being relieved for cause”. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4745 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O! c. Enclosure (2), the report of the HOMC PERB in Petitioner's case, shows that the PERB directed removing the contested fitness report for 1 January to 27 April 2008, but commented to the effect that the five remaining reports at issue should stand. In enclosure (5), Petitioner provided new evidence in support of his new request to remove the page 11 entries dated 11 June 2010 and 12 May 2011. g. In enclosures (6) and (7),...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5272 14
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 November 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. e. In enclosure (6), MIQ again commented to the effect that the contested entry dated 6 January 2012 should stand, but further commented to the effect that Petitioner’s request to remove the entries dated 14 December...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03941-11
The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 August 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) office with cognizance over Petitioner's request to remove the page 11 entry and the MCTFS weight control data has commented to the effect that the page...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3056 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070") entry dated 14 November 2011 (copy at Tab A). d. In enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps office with cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner’s case has commented to the effect his request should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13191-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 20 May 2010 and his rebuttal dated 24 May 2010, copies of which are at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dixit, McBride and Vogt, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on...